11 Best Biological Age Tests for 2024

11 Best Biological Age Tests for 2024

Update 10/2/2023: This post has been updated since we originally published it. I evaluated additional top biological age tests for 2024, removed companies that are no longer offering tests, and updated the post to reflect the most recent pricing. The post has been cleaned up and links were made current.

According to TikTok, I’m either 46-years-old, 37-years-old, or 29-years-old. As a 34-year-old woman, that’s, ahem, less than ideal.

TikTok offers a filter that guesses how old the user is based on their uploaded face. Pulling my long hair up into a ponytail ages me by over a decade, and standing in natural lighting makes me appear younger than I actually am.

And also to say that if I’m serious about anti-aging, I need to wear my hair down and more makeup if I’m going to make it to 80.

The thing is, my chronological age, or how old I am based on the day I was born, isn’t something I have much control over. I—like many other spanners—am far more concerned with biological aging (sometimes called phenotypic aging). Human life extension is fundamentally concerned with how old we are on a molecular level—and how quickly we are aging and, consequentially, how long we might live.

Affiliate Disclaimer: Longevity Advice is reader-supported. When you buy using links on our site, we may earn commissions.

Best Biological Age Tests

The question is: how do we quantify our biological age? The answer is in our aging biomarkers. The top biological age tests specifically look at our DNA. 

How do the best biological age tests work?

Knowing your own genetic makeup is critical for longevity—after all, your DNA could reveal that you’re at a heightened risk for age-related diseases like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s. But your DNA can also expose the rate at which you’re aging through small attachments known as epigenetic markers

Your DNA can’t change—think of it like the script of King Lear. No matter which playhouse you might watch the drama, the lines all remain uniform. However, the director, the actors, the stagehands—your epigenetics, to continue the metaphor—might change. If you eat poorly and exercise irregularly, your DNA’s performance might seem more akin to a high school production than a masterpiece produced by London’s Royal Shakespeare Company.

Epigenetics is a lot like a play. A gif of bad acting as an illustrative example for the best epigenetic tests.

In other words, your surroundings and lifestyle choices—like whether you regularly get enough Vitamin D, eat a nutrient-rich diet, and get enough sleep and exercise—can influence your risk of developing diseases like Type II diabetes, heart disease, and cancer, depending on your genetic predisposition to the ailments. Your epigenetics alter your gene activity to be more or less susceptible to these aging factors based on your environment. 

Unfortunately, every person is marching to an eventual encounter with an age-related disease should they not already have one yet. As you age, epigenetic changes accumulate throughout your body. Instead of celebrating annual birthdays as you chronologically age, your epigenetics produce markers, like rings on a tree, that inscribe your age on your DNA. 

In 2011, Dr. Steve Horvath published his analysis of hundreds of these epigenetic markers (or “DNA methylation and demethylation”). He found enough patterns to develop an epigenetic “clock,” or an estimate of someone’s age solely based on epigenetic patterns. That number may be older or younger than your chronological age. If you’re 50 and your biological age test says you’re 55, you are aging quicker than other 50-year-olds. If your test says that you’re, instead, 45, you are aging slower than other 50-year-olds. 

In a 2019 interview with Rhonda Patrick, Horvath notes that while some tissue, like a cancerous organ, may age faster than others, there’s a general consistency throughout the body for one’s biological age. At the time of that interview, he had not recorded anyone whose biological age is off by more than eight years relative to their chronological age. 

There are several consumer-grade DNA-methylation clocks. There are also proteomic clocks that look at the protein composition in their subjects’ blood samples instead of epigenetic indicators. Other clocks, like glycomic clocks, aren’t widely available. 

Why do biological age tests matter? What are their limitations?

Epigenetics can change a whole lot about a person, which is why biological age tests matter.
Fun fact: epigenetics can change the appearance of maize

A lifetime is far too long to learn about whether a lifespan intervention is actually working. Biological age tests provide benchmarks to inform individuals whether they should continue their current lifestyle or tweak it to decelerate aging. 

Unfortunately, the clocks themselves have a built-in problem. The better they’re able to accurately detect chronological age—certainly a requirement for the clock to have any meaning—the less valuable they are for predicting biological age. Dr. Mitteldorf explains,

The biostatisticians who create these clocks are optimizing them to predict chronological age with higher and higher correlation coefficient r. But if they achieve a perfect score of r=1.00, the clock becomes useless. It cannot be used to tell a 60-year-old with the metabolism of a 70-year-old from another 60-year-old with the metabolism of a 50-year-old, because both will register 60 years on this ‘perfect’ clock.

In other words, the biological aging tests are not and can never be perfect. And until we know the exact causes of aging (a step beyond the hallmarks of aging), a clock is only as good as our own understanding of why we age and how we record that process. Scientists and consumer-focused companies are iteratively improving their biological age tests, but it’s worth noting that not all are peer-reviewed or independently evaluated. There are also significant differences in findings by gender, race, and ethnicity—for example, women tend to develop more diseases later in life than men, but they nevertheless tend to die later. 

These nuanced differences from individual to individual highlight another problem with biological age tests: they’re great for looking at population-level trends, but they really aren’t able to tell how many years you have left to live. Your DNA methylation level might be similar to a group that statistically lives 3.5 years longer than others, but, as Dr. Horvath tells Wired, “It’s not the case we could nail down the date of death of an individual within plus or minus one year.” 

What makes any of these tests valuable, as of today, is what the spanner does with the number. 

How can a spanner make the most of a biological age test?

Source: Felix Wong. https://felixwong.com/2016/03/microsoft-band-2-strava/
Source: Felix Wong

A biological age test is really only valuable if it’s measuring an intervention. 

For example, can you lower your biological age—or at least reduce its aging rate—with a supplement like NMN or resveratrol?

Or a new prescription for Metformin over the course of six months? 

Or going from a vegan diet for longevity to a keto diet for the same, or switching from traditional weight training to HIIT workouts? 

There’s no way to benchmark these interventions without some kind of standardized way of doing so. 

So are paid biological age tests worth anything?

With all this in mind, I set out to find what the market had to offer directly to consumers. Which biological age tests are worth the time and the couple hundred dollars? Which tests don’t hold up?

Unfortunately… there isn’t much to fairly compare them by. Few companies offer an impressive security level for your health data (which we all may want, seeing as life insurance companies may start taking an interest in the results of these tests). Pricing—if available on their website—tends to vary more on what additional services the company offers, like coaching, than the raw epigenetic information these companies return to the user. The methylation analysis procedure for each business certainly differs, but not in a way that can be evaluated based on their marketing material. 

In other words, each of these companies offers a whole lot of the same. And their advice hinges on the obvious: if you’re aging quicker than what you’d like, prioritize sleep, water, and a healthy diet, work out a heck of a lot more, don’t smoke, and stress a little bit less. Remember, the FDA has not approved any direct-to-consumer tests like biological age tests, so the findings can’t formally diagnose you with anything. Technically, the most medical advice these companies can give you is, “Go see a doctor.” 

I won’t go as far to say that paid epigenetic tests are worthless—DNA methylation analysis is considered far more accurate for estimating one’s biological age than a blood test, and you can only get that kind of analysis with a lab. 

The best biological age tests

Let’s take a brief look at what some of the leading top biological age test companies actually have to offer. All of these services suggest retesting every six months. Seeing as the companies are difficult to formally compare, I arranged them alphabetically and omitted tests that cost more than $500. I also deprioritized tests that require a lab visit (for more on those tests, see our list of the best blood tests for longevity), otherwise tests like Thorne’s $95 Biological Age Health Panel would have made the list.

1. DoNotAge (Use code “LONGEVITYADVICE” for 10% off)

DoNotAge uses a saliva sample to determine your biological age. They claim to use machine learning to determine “these complex patterns and derive your true biological age,” but they don’t provide more of a breakdown to discerning spanners. They offer a 14-day money-back guarantee on all orders. Unfortunately, DoNotAge does not supply an explicit policy for what they can do with your health data. For $275 a test, DoNotAge is a middle-of-the-road option for those wanting to track their biological age. 

2. Elysium Index (Use this link to get a discount to $299)

Elysium collects saliva samples to evaluate the biological age of its users. Their reports also reveal the user’s cumulative rate of aging. Elysium uses their own system—Algorithmic Platform for Epigenetic Examination, or “APEX,”—to evaluate DNA methylation. The company has a super in-depth privacy policy, and it’s notable that they leave an audit trail of which employees access each individual sample. Elysium is the most expensive product on this list, clocking in at a cool $499.

3. EpiAging USA

EpiAging USA was founded by Dr. Moshe Szyf, who is most famous for his research on the effects of epigenetics on aging. The biological age test uses a saliva sample to evaluate its users’ cellular DNA. At $169, EpiAging’s kits are relatively inexpensive, and unlike other tests on this list, it’s HIPAA verified. Users get access to EpiAging’s Android and iOS apps, which provide little lifestyle nudges based on the results of the test.

4. GlycanAge

GlycanAge is a little different from other tests on this list in that it doesn’t rely on epigenetic markers. Instead, it examines your IgG glycosylation. IgG glycosylation refers to the process where sugar molecules are attached to IgG proteins. IgG proteins are a type of antibody, which are crucial components of our immune system. Metaphorically, IgG glycosylation outfits our immune system’s “soldiers” with specialized gear to make them more effective in defending the body against various threats. Each “gear” combination has its own unique benefits and influences the soldier’s capabilities on the battlefield of the body. Glycans correlate with the amount of inflammation in the body, which GlycanAge uses to calculate biological age. At $348, GlycanAge is a bit more expensive than other options, but its unique approach to calculating biological age may make it a good complementary test to epigenetic tests for spanners looking for a more complete picture of their health.

5. Muhdo

Muhdo is based out of the UK but ships internationally. Their biological age test, DNA Transform, costs $299.99. The kit includes a comprehensive action plan based on your DNA results, including meal guides, supplement suggestions, and scores for eye, hearing, and memory ages. As a UK company, they offer a more comprehensive data retention policy that adheres to GDPR. 

6. My Aging Tests

My Aging Tests provides an at-home blood test kit to send in for DNA methylation testing based on Horvath’s clock. The package includes a one-on-one longevity consultation and a few bonuses, namely your immune system status and an overview of your immunosenescence. My Aging Tests costs $325. My Aging Tests’ privacy policy specifies they conform to GDPR regulations.

7. myDNAge

For $299, users can submit either a blood or urine sample for epigenetic feedback. myDNAge uses SWARM™ technology (Simplified Whole-panel Amplification Reaction Method) to evaluate the samples, a proprietary analysis method. Users get a single-page report back with their biological age, biological age relative to others their age, and biological age relative to the rest of the population. While myDNAge claims that they won’t give away information about your results, they do reserve the right to sell your personal identifying information to third parties

8. Novos

Novos harnesses the potent capabilities of the 3rd generation DunedinPACE Rate of Aging Clock, a creation of renowned scientists at Columbia and Duke Universities. Users receive detailed, actionable insights rooted in a simple finger-prick blood test. Each kit comes replete with a comprehensive 55-page report, offering tailored strategies to optimize lifestyle for enhanced longevity, and bonus tests like telomere length. NOVOS Age comes in at $349 per kit, a price point slightly above its market counterparts.

9. Tally Health

Dr. David Sinclair’s own Tally Health offers both subscription and one-off biological age tests. TallyAge™ is engineered from a robust in-house dataset comprising over 8,000 individuals, aged 18-100, ensuring a comprehensive and diversified analysis. This dataset, curated from human cheek swabs, not only spans a broad chronological age range but also boasts significant ethnic, racial, and gender diversity, with a balanced number of females and males (something not advertised for other tests). At $229 per kit, TallyAge™ aligns with the pricing of most other biological age tests on the market.

10. TruDiagnostic TruAge

TruAge is notably more expensive than several other offerings on this list. At $499, users need to send in a prick of blood to get their epigenetic age. TruDiagnostic explains, “TruDiagnostic’s TruAge™ [Complete] kit tests over 900,000 spots on the genome which is 425 times more important data than any other test on the market.” It’s worth noting that TruDiagnostic has by far the most robust privacy policy available from these labs and they prioritize encrypting their users’ data. 

11. TruMeTruAge Explorer

For just $110, TruMe offers a zero bells-and-whistles DNA methylation test. The test was founded by Dr. Yelena Budovskaya. While the website claims that users will “receive personalized recommendations on how to improve or maintain your health,” there are no screenshots or examples of them doing so. TruMe is the test that Ponce de Leon Health used to document the anti-aging effects of their supplement, Rejuvant Lifetabs. At $110, this is a cheaper option for spanners looking for a deal.

What about blood-based biological tests?

Source: UC San Diego 

DIY tests like ageless RX and Michael Lustgarten’s spreadsheet (based on Morgan Levine’s phenotypic age calculator) might be more worth your while. That said, using these tools does ask a lot of a user. For example, my blood tests (CBC with differential, comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, A1C, and vitamin B12 and folate) didn’t cover everything needed for Aging.Ai, which left me guessing on the remaining blank inputs (everything needed to be filled out to hit “enter”). Those guesses likely interfered with the final output—and wouldn’t be a good benchmark for future biological age tests. 

Spanners without a PhD in biostatistics will have to rely on the functions built into the DIY biological age spreadsheets. Ultimately that’s not so different than sending your spit off to a company, but the scientific teams behind the lab work are likely more dedicated to keeping their algorithms up to date.

There are paid longevity blood test services which we covered last week, like InsideTracker (used by and invested in by longevity expert David Sinclair), Tally Health (also a David Sinclair product), or LifeExtension.com’s blood tests, that do analyze your blood work for aging markers. I personally question whether their analyses are more thorough and insightful than getting blood work done through a doctor (and, with insurance, at a substantially reduced price). Users are paying for convenience above all else with these services.

Do you invest in biological age tests?

Tracking your epigenetic age isn’t cheap, but it may be well worth the insights if you’re actively engaging in anti-aging interventions. Have you tried any of the companies I listed above? Are you manually tracking your blood work—or paying a third party to do so? Why or why not?

Let us know in the comments!


  1. Rob

    Interesting article, thanks. I’ve been studying metabolism since I retired at age 61 (now 66) and have arrived at the conclusion that; we are incredibly dynamic organisms, we have multiple redundancies built in to all our systems that correct or offset imbalances, and that we are complex beyond our ability yet to detect the subtle patterns. Then there is the research that is claiming that our critical systems, renal, hepatic, cardio pulmonary, etc.., age at different rates!

    Since I’m trained to think in probabilities I try to move the odds in my favor by doing enough favorable things well (exercise, sleep, nutrition, etc..). As such these tests are perhaps useful for people who want affirmation about themselves but have no value for me. My test is how I feel. How confident am I that I can do something challenging? The answers are that I mostly feel great and that I know I can do things that only few very healthy younger people can do. Perhaps the biological age score should be determined by ones ability to perform when challenged physically, cognitively and emotionally rather than via spit or blood.

  2. Paul

    The usefulness of these epigenetic tests to measure the results of interventions, hinges on the test/retest variability. That means, if I test my DNA methylation now vs. a few days from now, the results need to be extremely close.

    Steve Horvath’s GrimAge has a very low test/retest variability. Also Morgan Levine’s lab is actively working on eliminating the noise that causes this variability.

    1. sherlockhomer

      I will let you know when I get my results. I tested in Jan 2023 and they were so freaked out by the results they wanted me to retest free of charge (epiagingUSA) they said it is highly unusual for a man is his low 60’s to have results in the upper 30’s to lower 40’s. It is now march 12 and I’m still waiting to hear the results.

  3. Pingback: Why Do We Age? 4 Theories of Aging - Longevity Advice

  4. Pingback: Why is Nutrition So Damned Confusing? - Longevity Advice

  5. Pingback: Caloric Restriction for Longevity - Longevity Advice

  6. Pingback: Is Human Life Extension Possible? - Longevity Advice

  7. Pingback: 9 Best Longevity Books for 2021 - Longevity Advice

  8. Pingback: Mediterranean Diet for Longevity - Longevity Advice

  9. Ford

    Great article! I just learned about some of the research being done by my son who just happened to mention it as an interesting topic he had listened to on a podcast. I’m in my early 50s and in pretty good health. Before I heard of all this i decided it would be cool to live another 100 years. It was kind of a long shot but why not? Then I stumble onto all this stuff about how to control aging. Its fantastic! I never really took multivitamins seriously or supplements but I am now . The DNA test and also bloodwork seem almost a must for me to see if these things actually work. I picked one of those companies you listed and I’m interested in seeing the results now and in the long run.

      1. Ford

        Muhdo for the DNA test and Life Extension for the blood test. This is a very new practice for me. Almost like brushing teeth because you find out months and years down the road how well your doing at the checkups. If all goes well I was thinking I might be around for the next big thing after global warming. I’m thinking it might be a small one compared to biological changes happening from all the biological modifications seeping into the environment. There is definitely no shortage of things to do with life. I’m very surprised when I mention longer lives to people that many don’t want any of it. I’d have to say that may be just as big of a problem for health. People not finding life enjoyable enough to want to stick around.

  10. Zack

    Hello Rachel

    After half a day of research, it appears that nobody has done a public comparison between the results from the available companies. Repeatability is also unknown.

    Somebody should start a crowdfunding campaign to get multiple tests done at once to see how repeatable the data is (extra money can go to a second comparison 1-6 months later).
    I’m willing to do this on myself and I will put in the 1st $500 in, but if you are willing to do that (you can certainly get more traffic through your website) then I will be the 1st to contribute to your tests.
    Somebody needs to get this done. What do you think?
    what do you think?

  11. Pingback: Sugar and Aging: What You Need to Know

  12. Mike McCloskey

    I don’t put much faith in TruDiagnostic “robust privacy policy” given that they sent me an email message with my password in the clear. They are supposed to store a password hash, not the password.

  13. Don Mazzola

    Thank you for your article. I have been watching most if not all David’s Sinclair podcast which are convincing. Have purchased his book and some supplements. Do feel more energized but I take so supplements, not sure which is working the best. 🙂
    You broke down a better definition of Epigenetics for me to understand.

    Thank You, Well written!

  14. Bill

    With regard to taking NMN, resveratrol or other longevity supplements to lower biological age, my reason for taking certain longevity supplements is to improve my health and not specifically to lower or reduce my biological age.

    After taking NMN, Trans-resveratrol and Fisetin, I have gotten results that validate the use of these supplements. In my case, my weight has lowered due to what I think is improved metabolism, better and longer sleep and more energy.

    In my opinion, living longer is fine, but living healthier for a long time is better.

  15. Pingback: 7 Best Life Extension Blood Tests and Companies in 2024

  16. Andrew Denton

    I took a battery of tests from a home blood prick with Regenerous Labs (Tru Age) and they were all over the place. I have a chronological age of 60, one test said I was 26 another 38, then my tele mores said I was 68. I have parents and grandparents in their 90’s and no cancer history and yet the Myotic Clock test about cell division basically said I was going to drop dead tomorrow – it totally freaked me out! My advice is if you are login to do these then get a proper blood draw, book into discus the results with a Doctor one to one. The Regenerous service was dreadful and I have zero confidence in their results or interpretation of them.

  17. Arthur Fagen

    I am 72 years of age and have taken 3 of the below tests:
    1..Elysium Index – indicated a biological age of 52 when I took it 1 and 1/2 years ago and a rate of aging slower than 95% of the population.
    2. TruAge diagnostics – biological age of 59 and 1/2 – most detailed report which I trust more than the other tests.
    3.Tally Health – various test results ranging from 74-82(tests every 3 months)

  18. Aaron

    Perhaps an idea for a future article, discuss the recent studies around metformin and resveratrol. There is a lot of debate recently and evidence to suggest that taking these as supplements is not advised. It’s posed as a question in this particular article, so it’s not an endorsement for these supplements, but an update to these topics would be useful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *